1. Home
  2. DPS marketplace
Technology - HSCN Access Services DPS

Clarifications

There are 131 clarifications for this DPS

51. Call Off Terms Clause 10 and Call Off Schedule 6 (Service Levels) Annex 2 to Part A: Critical Service Failure: We refer to Clause 10.1 and the description of what constitutes a Critical Service Failure at Call Off Schedule 6 (Service Levels) Annex 2 to Part A: Critical Service Failure. Does Clause 10.1 and the occurrence of a Critical Service Failure mean that on the third occasion that the Service Failure Threshold is breached that instead of receiving Service Credits the Customer is entitled to receive (by way of compensation) the whole charges (in respect of the relevant Service Instance)?
We will insert a new clause 35.1.3(d)(C) in the HSCN call off contract as follows: 35.1.3(d)(C) - the Customer shall not be entitled to payment of the Charges for Critical Service Level Failure pursuant to clause 10.1 (Critical Service Level Failure).
Answered
06/11/2017 22:36
50. Call Off Terms Schedule 1 (Definitions): We are concerned that the definition of "Sub-Contractor" is too wide. Connectivity providers will not have this level of visibility down the supply chain and the definition is inconsistent with the definition of "Sub-Contractor" in schedule 1 (Definitions) of the DPS (which drives the definition of "Key-Sub-contractors" for the purpose of both the DPS and Call Off Terms). Please will the Authority align the two defined terms and amend the definition of Sub-Contractor in schedule 1 (Definitions) by removing the words "and any third party with whom that third party enters into a Sub-Contract or its servants or agents".
The definition necessarily differs between the two documents due to the context and purpose of each. It is right that the Customer should rely upon the Supplier to be fully aware of and manage the delivery of all Services under a Call Off Contract (which it also has full responsibility for as per Call Off Clause 25.2.1) and not simply those it delivers directly. The definitions will remain as drafted.
Answered
31/10/2017 17:40
49. Call Off Terms Clause 38.7.1(a): Is the reference to Clause 7.2.8 of the Dynamic Purchasing System Agreement correct - should it be 7.2.7?
"You are correct - the current cross reference to DPS Agreement Clause 7.2.8 is incorrect and it should be to Call Off Clause 3.2.7, as per below. This change will be applied to the Call Off Contract. "(a) the warranty given by the Supplier pursuant to Clause 3.2.7 of this Call Off Contract is materially untrue; or "
Answered
31/10/2017 17:41
48. Call Off Terms Clause 6.1.4(c)E: At Clause 6.1.4(c)E the Customer has the ability to ask for a "Service Compatibility Assessment". The Order Form states "Tick if required. See clause 6.1.4 (c) (E) of the Call Off Terms and Section E of this form which requires you to provide additional information." The last part of the clause 6.1.4(c)E states"...or otherwise used by the Supplier in connection with this Call Off Contract" seems to infer that they have to be compliant in any event (irrespective of what is specified in the Order Form). Will the Authority please clarify what is required when a Customer requests a Compatibility Assessment Statement and what Clause 6.1.4(c)E means where the Order Form is not completed in that regard?
Under Call Off Clause 6.1.4(c)(E) the Supplier is obliged to ensure that the Services it provides are compatible with those listed elements that are required for the delivery of the Services. The Order Form caters for instances where the Customer requires a specific assessment to evidence this compatibility.
Answered
31/10/2017 17:43
47. Call Off Terms Clause 6.2.1: Where the Customer has not elected to receive Delay Payments on the Order Form - what would the Customer's remedy for late delivery be? Would Clause 6.2.1 and clause 6.4.2 apply?
Correct - where Delay Payments were not included in an Implementation Plan (which is the Customer's decision) and a Milestone had not been Achieved any payments associated with Achieving that Milestone, and any dependencies upon it would not become payable until such time as it had been Achieved. As per Clause 6.4.2 the Customer may also classify such failure as a material Default and exercise its other rights in that eventuality.
Answered
31/10/2017 17:44
46. Call Off Terms Clause 6.4.2: Please confirm that (where the Customer has chosen to receive Delay Payments in the Order Form) the words "....without prejudice to any other rights and remedies of the Customer howsoever arising..." at clause 6.4.2 do not serve to allow a secondary and contemporaneous claim for damages for failure to achieve a Milestone by the Milestone Date in respect of which Delay Payments are payable (in particular clause 5.5.1(b) stating that Delay Payments shall be the Customer's exclusive financial remedy for the Supplier's failure to Achieve a corresponding Milestone by its Milestone Date except in the circumstances specified at clause 5.5.1(b) A and B).
Correct - Acknowledging and excepting the exclusions under Call Off Clause 5.5.1(b) where a Customer has specified that Delay Payments are applicable these are the exclusive financial remedies available to the Customer in the event of non-Achievement of a Milestone.
Answered
31/10/2017 17:46
45. Call Off Terms Clause 5.5.1(b)(B) and 5.5.1(c): We assume that notwithstanding clause 5.5.1(b)(B) the Supplier's liability in respect of Delay Payments does not stop on the one hundredth day. If the Milestone is not achieved the Supplier keeps paying Delay Payments on and beyond the one hundredth day until such time as the Milestone is achieved. Is this assumption correct?
Correct - Delay Payments could continue to accrue beyond 100 days but it is anticipated that a Customer would exercise (or have exercised) another of its rights at or close to this time to extinguish the ongoing Delay Payments, most likely termination for material Default.
Answered
31/10/2017 17:47
44. Call Off Terms Clause 5.5.1(d): We refer to (d) "...to recover any such damages..." please confirm that the word "damages" should be read to mean "Delay Payments" and not any other type of damages.
Correct - the context of the entirety of Call Off Clause 5.5 is Delay Payments.
Answered
31/10/2017 17:48
43. CQ and Response number 1 : lause 4.2 of the Call Off Terms requires that the Supplier shall, at least six (6) months prior to the expiry of the Call Off Contract Period, provide notification to the Customer of such expiry to enable the Customer to decide if an extension is required. Can you please clarify if the Supplier is required to provide this notification for all Call Off Orders or only those that have recorded an extension option on the Order Form. The 6 month notification is intended to serve as a reminder for Customers that their Call Off Contract will expire unless an extension option (if available) is exercised. Even where an extension option is not available this notification will also be useful to inform Customers of the impending contract expiry and to progress relevant replacement procurement activity. To confirm, the notification is required 6 months prior to expiry for ALL Call Off Contracts. We refer to Clarification Question and Response above. The RM3825_DPS Template Order Form.docx does not include/make provision for the Customer to indicate that an Extension Period is required (unlike the RM1045 Order Form). Does that mean there is no requirement for the Customer to specify that an extension is required (as per the RM1045 Order Form) and that it can simply exercise the right to extend a Call Off Contract up to a 60 month period or would it need to expressly state such option to extend somewhere on the Order Form? If so where?
The Customer has a default right to extend the Call Off Period, provided this does not cause the Call Off Period to exceed 60 Months, and does not need to express the intention in the Order Form. If the Customer requests the full 60 month term, then the notification six months prior to the end of the call off alerts the customer to the need to replace the contract. The Call Off Contract Initial Period appears in Section B of the Order Form.
Answered
01/11/2017 17:40
42. DPS Schedule 10 Guarantee The general principle underpinning the Guarantee is that the obligations or liabilities on the Guarantor (under than the Guarantee) should be (shall be) no greater than those imposed on the Supplier under the Guaranteed Agreement (clause 2.3 and 2.4 refers). We are concerned that the Guarantee as drafted is not clear on the principle that the total combined liability of the Guarantor and the Supplier should not exceed the aggregate liability of the Supplier under the Guaranteed Agreement. Please will the Authority confirm that this is indeed the intent and then update the drafting to reflect this clarification accordingly? If the Authority is not minded to clarify the drafting (on the point raised) at this stage of the procurement procedure will the Authority please confirm that the parties may clarify and update the drafting on the point (should it prove necessary to provide a Guarantee) at the time?
The recitals to the Deed of Guarantee make it clear that the Guarantor will guarantee all of the Supplier's obligations under the relevant agreement. Guaranteed Obligations are defined to mean "all obligations and liabilities of the Supplier to the Beneficiary that are supplemental to, incurred under, ancillary to or calculated by reference to the Guaranteed Agreement". The drafting makes it clear that the Supplier's liability is as stated in the DPS agreement and the Guarantor's obligations and liability as provided for in the standard government deed of guarantee template agreement are limited to those of the Supplier under the Guaranteed Agreement.
Answered
02/11/2017 16:57
41. The latest versions of the DPS Agreement and Call Off Terms contain comprehensive changes that have been applied since the last opportunity that suppliers had to discuss the terms and conditions in detail with the CCS and NHSD (the event held 21st September was the last to include T's & C's as an agenda item), moreover some of the changes that were applied by the CCS to earlier drafts have subsequently been reversed (e.g. Call Off Implementation Period added and then removed, Exit Schedule made completely optional but now mandatory and significantly revised, etc.). Will the CCS allow a sufficient extension to the procurement timetable to allow suppliers a full review of these new terms and arrange another Supplier Update session to enable industry feedback and discussion on these changes?
The suite of contractual documents have been developed and refined between CCS and NHS Digital, factoring feedback and input from customer and supplier organisations. The few adjustments which have been applied to the most recently shared document set have been made to simplify and streamline the procurement process for HSCN connectivity services under the DPS. No extension to the clarification period is considered necessary as bidders can apply to join the DPS at any point during its validity. Please refer to the timelines published in the DPS needs document. Please ensure that questions are submitted throughout the period prior to the deadline, and preferably not in bulk on the final day of the deadline. With specific reference to the Implementation Period: The removal of this concept allows the Supplier and Customer to agree the Go-Live Date and Service Instance Period for each Service Instance. Careful planning of these within the Call-Off Contract Period should mitigate the risk. Bidders should familiarise themselves with the concept of Service Instances (i.e. which have their own specific Implementation Plan) and the relevant definitions. The HSCN Authority requires, as a minimum, that a standard Exit Plan is in place for all Call Off Contacts. The updated terms requires a supplier to comply with the provisions of Schedule 9 and its standard Exit Plan from the SQ Response. Where a consumer requires any additional support outside of these provisions, such support would be chargeable (clause 5.1.3, Schedule 9 Exit Management refers). Please also review the responses to all other clarification questions.
Answered
30/10/2017 16:42
40. Could you please confirm what time on 6th November is the deadline for questions.
To ensure we are able to respond to your questions as close to this date as possible, the deadline for receipt of questions will be 11:00 am on 6th November. Any questions we receive after this time will be responded to once the DPS has been established.
Answered
30/10/2017 14:30
39. Can the commissioners please confirm that the only requirement for submission and admission onto this framework is the completion of the standard selection questionnaire? Are there any other documents that need to be submitted or any other steps that will need completing such as technical questionnaires and alike? Kind Regards,
Bidders must submit requests to participate in this procurement to establish the RM3825 HSCN Access Services Dynamic Purchasing System via the Sid4Gov Supplier Registration/Selection route. Please see the Welcome section (paragraphs 1 - 43) of the DPS Needs document for details on how to submit a request to participate. The DPS Needs can be downloaded with the rest of the bid pack from: https://supplierregistration.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/dps#technology
Answered
30/10/2017 16:33
38. We are a current N3 aggregator, how do we become part of the DPS as we are not HSCN compliant but will be a re-seller of HSCN services.
Please visit the HSCN supplier information webpage to determine whether HSCN compliance is required. https://digital.nhs.uk/health-social-care-network/suppliers Contact the HSCN team for more information about your specific circumstances enquiries@nhsdigital.nhs.uk
Answered
27/10/2017 15:41
37. With reference to the supplier webinar on the application process. Will Suppliers have access to the video after the webinar?
Yes, all information will be distributed to attendees following the webinar and will be available to download from the CCS webpage at http://ccs-agreements.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/node/6903
Answered
27/10/2017 15:40
36. Is subcontracting a must with this DPS?
No, the sub-contractor questions in the HSCN specific questionnaire will only appear if you have confirmed in your standard selection questionnaire that you use sub-contractors. If suppliers are capable of delivering all services directly then these questions do not require an answer.
Answered
27/10/2017 15:39
35. Please can we get more details around how to achieve HSCN Stage 2 Compliance?
The information on HSCN Compliance is available on the HSCN website, and links to the information are available in our Customer Needs document which is available in the Bid Pack.
Answered
27/10/2017 15:39
34. Our PSN Services are provided via a Subcontractor. If we select 'Yes' to the PSN question, our company name won't show up on the PSN-compliance webpage.
The questionnaire is self certifying. If you provide PSN services via a sub-contractor, suppliers are able to answer 'yes' and in the proposal to the customer they will detail which sub-contractor is PSN-compliant. This will then be used to certify PSN-compliance.
Answered
27/10/2017 15:38
33. The provisions at clause 38.2, 38.3 and 38.5 do not seem to align. Is the result of clause 38 that all Notices are to be served by email but it is just those matters detailed at clause 38.2 that need to be the subject of a Notice in document form and attached as a PDF to an email? If so what is the purpose of clause 38.5?
The provisions are not contradictory - the Clause states that electronic submission of correspondence is acceptable and Clause 38.3 stipulates the Notices which must be provided as soft copy documents attached to an email. In all other circumstances correspondence in the body text of an email will be considered sufficient. Clause 38.5 merely provides the postal address of the Authority which is required in the widely accepted correct format for formal written correspondence. It should also be noted that although this Clause recognises and accepts electronic submission of notices it does not preclude the use of the postal system for hard copy correspondence.
Answered
27/10/2017 15:37
32. Will the Authority please clarify the position where any audit reveals that the Supplier has overpaid the Management Levy?
The Management Levy is calculated based on the declared spend reported back to the Authority in the Supplier's Management Information. Experience shows that under payment of the Management Levy is far more frequent than over payment. Where an audit identified any over payment of the Management Levy then the recovery of any such amount to the Supplier would be agreed between the Parties, most likely by a credit applied to the next Management Levy due to the Authority.
Answered
27/10/2017 15:35

Welcome to Supplier Registration Service chat.
Please do not send any confidential information.

Please be aware that this chat is using translation software powered by Google Translate which may affect the accuracy of the language and phrases used.

Are you sure you wish to end this chat? Are you sure you wish to disconnect this chat? New chat message from Please use the 'End Chat' link to end this chat and close the window. Do you want to reset the chat window position? Reset windows